2017

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://imori.ac.mn:4000/handle/20.500.12989/831

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 31
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    FOCUS ON COMPARISONS OF URBANIZATION PROCESSES AND PROBLEMS BETWEEN SOUTH KOREA AND CHINA*
    (ШУА-ийн Олон улсын харилцааны хүрээлэн, 2017-09) Chang-Hwan, Yu; Myagmarsuren, Ukhnaa; Shun-Bo, Yao
    This research compared with problems that generated during urbanization process in Korea and China. Additionally, the current study analyzed solutions for issues such as public policies and reform plans. In 2014, the urbanization levels (% of total) were 91.7% in South Korea, whereas the rate in China was 54.3% that is nearly half of urbanization levels in Korea. It showed that China in a transition stage of urbanization. To look at the issues during urbanization process in Korea and China, it showed the problems of environment, suburbs, lands, transportations, rushed developments and etc. in Korea. Meanwhile China showed the issues of social tensions, suburbs, city environment, initial city developments leading to administrative problems, migrant workers and etc. This study extracted both countries’ similarities and differences to benchmark reform plans.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    MONGOLIA’S ECONOMIC SECURITY: HOW CAN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FURTHER SUPPORT MONGOLIAN NATIONAL SECURITY THROUGH DEVELOPING ITS MINING SECTOR
    (ШУА-ийн Олон улсын харилцааны хүрээлэн, 2017-09) T, Munkh-Orgil
    A strong economy is the pillar of an effective national security strategy and an instrument of national power. Mongolia’s geographic position between two political and economic powers (China and Russia) provides both opportunities and disadvantages for Mongolia’s economy. Mongolia’s economy is currently sustained through exports of raw minerals to its neighboring countries, which means Mongolia is vulnerable to the mineral market values of those countries. Moreover, highly ambitious natural resource extraction hinders other potentially productive domestic economic manufacturing sectors, which impacts Mongolia’s overall economic development. Therefore, Mongolia needs to develop a multi-pillared, sustainable economic structure based on its resources under a strategic institutional management.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    MONGOLIA’S FACTOR IN THE NEA REGIONAL COOPERATION1
    (ШУА-ийн Олон улсын харилцааны хүрээлэн, 2017-09) Ts, Baatar
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    AGWANG DORZHIEV-BETWEEN CZAR’S RUSSIA AND DALAI LAMA’S TIBET 1889-1907
    (ШУА-ийн Олон улсын харилцааны хүрээлэн, 2017-09) Gencang, Meng
    Since the late 19 century and early 20 century, Tibet became more and more strategic place for British because Russian Czar’s expansion into Central Asia directly threatened to India-‘the jewel in the crown’ of the British Empire. As a result, British government hurried its diplomatic step toward Tibet. In 1893, Qing government signed a contract with British, without Tibetan representative, promising British special trade rights in Tibet. Under such circumstances, Dozhiev, a Buriat Lama, also a close adviser of Thirteenth Dalai Lama, urged His Holiness to seek help from Czar’s Russia to prevent Tibet from British expansion since Manchu Qing was not powerful enough to protect Tibet anymore. This short paper tries to answer the questions like, what was the nature of his missions to Russia? And what was the relationship between Tibet and Russia during his missions in boarder international power relations?
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    COULD QING DYNASTY AWARDS FOR MONGOL NOBLES BE PURCHASED? (17th – pre-20th century)
    (ШУА-ийн Олон улсын харилцааны хүрээлэн, 2017-09) Uranguai, Jamsran
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    COOPERATION OR CONNECTIVITY: HOW WILL THE SCO FUNCTION FROM NOW?
    (ШУА-ийн Олон улсын харилцааны хүрээлэн, 2017-09) Wang, Li; P, Bayartsetseg
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    PROSPECTS FOR FORESTRY COOPERATION BETWEEN CHINA AND MONGOLIA IN THE “THE BELT AND ROAD”INITIATIVE
    (ШУА-ийн Олон улсын харилцааны хүрээлэн, 2017-09) Tian, Gang Wu
    Mongolia, as one of the important neighbors in China, has a great role in maintaining soil and water and preventing land degradation, and the two countries have strong complementarity in forestry industry structure and broad prospects for forestry cooperation. Through the analysis of Mongolian forestry development status, to find out the root causes of its problems. It points out the advantages of cooperation between China and Mongolia, and puts forward the specific path of forestry cooperation between the two countries according to the main advantages of cooperation between the two countries. The focus of cooperation between the two countries should be on forest protection, forestry trade, and forest tourism and so on. China and Mongolia should take the “The Belt and Road” strategy as an opportunity to strengthen forestry cooperation and achieve mutual benefit and win-win situation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    GLOBALISM WITH CHINESE CHARACTERISTICS
    (ШУА-ийн Олон улсын харилцааны хүрээлэн, 2017-09) Yury, Tavrovsky
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    EARLIER AND CONTEMPORARY RELATIONS BETWEEN CHINA AND AFRICA
    (ШУА-ийн Олон улсын харилцааны хүрээлэн, 2017-09) G, Enkhtuya
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A NEW PARADIGM IN MONGOLIA’S «THIRD NEIGHBOR» DIPLOMACY AND SOFT BALANCING
    (ШУА-ийн Олон улсын харилцааны хүрээлэн, 2017-09) D, Ulambayar
    Mongolia is the only one state in the Northeast Asian region, which has established with all states legal basis of strategic and comprehensive partnership, and friendly relationship and cooperation framework in bilateral level. In other words, Mongolia has any serious conflicts with countries of the region, and especially no political controversies became an important achievement in Mongolia’s national security. Mongolia’s “third neighbor” diplomacy is, besides of geographical policy and understanding, not only related to certain country, it is more concept of theory of international relations emerged on geographical and space specifics and covering areas of politics, economics, geopolitics and security. Mongolia’s “third neighbor” diplomacy is geopolitics originated directly from Mongolia’s national interests, connected with geographical specific location and in longterm in order to secure and maintain appropriate balance of power in the middle of policies and measures conducting by two neighbors and to ensure national security comprehensively by political-diplomatic and economic means, and in wider context a definition comprising subjects such as western and eastern democratic, developed countries and UN, influencial to world politics, and unbending supporter of Mongolia’s democracy and policy of market economy. Theoretical base of “third neighbor” diplomacy is balance of power or soft balancing and balance of interests. At the present, Mongolia has became a “third neighbor” her global geopolitical environment and formed that is legal framework, etc.,